Judge responds to Angelina Jolie's attempts to have him removed from divorce case






Judge responds to Angelina Jolie's attempts to have him removed from divorce case
U.S. judge John W. Ouderkirk insists he has no personal bias or prejudice concerning any party‚ attorney or any other person participating in Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's divorce case.U.S. judge John W. Ouderkirk insists he has no personal bias or prejudice concerning any party‚ attorney or any other person participating in Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's divorce case.
The couple separated back in 2016, and the actors officially became single again in April 2019 after obtaining a bifurcated judgment - ending their marriage but giving them time to reach financial and custody settlements relating to their six kids.

Earlier this month, the Maleficent star asked for the judge to be removed from their case, citing issues regarding his other business engagements with one of Pitt's attorneys, Anne C. Kiley - a move Pitt is opposing.
And in new legal papers obtained by Entertainment Tonight, Ouderkirk denies under penalty of perjury that he has failed to disclose multiple professional, business, and financial relationships, created and ongoing during the course of the matter.
"I will continue to consider accepting other cases as other additional cases may arise from time to time while the Jolie/Pitt case is still pending. Such other cases might involve party, lawyer‚ law firm and/or witnesses involved in the Jolie/Pitt matter," he states in the documents.
The judge further declares he can and will remain impartial in Pitt and Jolie's case, and requests court officials give due consideration to accompanying documents and evidence supporting that claim.
According to Pitt, Ouderkirk has, "a well-documented history with the parties to this proceeding their counsel, including, without limitation, being hand-selected by Jolie to preside over the couple's nuptials in 2014".
The Once Upon a Time in Hollywood star has further accused Jolie of objecting to the judge's involvement in the case "purely for strategic reasons".
Reference: Cover Media: 2 days ago: 27/08/2020
Articles-Popular
- Main
- Contact Us
- Planetary Existences-2
- Planetary Existences
- TWO REVELATIONS-2
- Jeffery Epstein - The Saga - 9
- Jeffery Epstein - The Saga - 8
- Jeffery Epstein - The Saga - 10
- The Two Revelations
- The Fourth Way - Study of Oneself - P.D.Ouspensky
- Impeachment Investigators Subpoena White House - Ukraine
- Universality of Initiation
- The Path Of Initiation
- The Participants In The Mysteries-2
- Initiation and the Devas
- The Fourth Way - Wrong Functions - P.D Ouspensky
- The Final Initiation
- Statues are a mark of honour. Like Edward Colston, Cecil Rhodes and Oliver Cromwell have to go
- Discipleship - Group Relations - 2
- The Probationary Path - 2
- The Participants In The Mysteries
- Discipleship - Group Relationships
- Discipleship
- The Succeeding Two Initiations
- Jeffery Epstein - The Saga - 7
- Jeffery Epstein - The Saga - 6
Articles - Latest
- They Lied to Us! The Truth They Hid About Hitler’s Death — Gerard Williams
- Ramaposa Dragged Out of Parliament
- Madagascar Goverment Collapse
- The Reality of Digital Id
- Welcome To The End Of Western Dominance
- Why is the Sahel turning its back on France?
- Sarkozy gets 5 years in prison in Gadhafi case
- The EU in 2025: A union at the crossroads of chaos
- Deep distrust of EU leaves Italy's Meloni in a corner over bailout fund
- Regime crisis in France: Bayrou falls, now Macron must go!
- Idi Amin president of Uganda
- Anger at Starmer's 'surrender deal' that hands Spain control over Gibraltar border
- Iran doubles down as US signals Israel could strike during nuclear talks
- What could have caused Air India plane to crash in 30 seconds?
- WW3 fears explode as Britain now Russia's 'enemy number 1' - even ahead of Ukraine



