MailChimp

Subscribe to Newsletter
Please wait

Cosmic Energy

Login Form

Ads Remote

Who's On Line

We have 111 guests and no members online

Emir of Qatar arrives in Moscow to talk with Putin about Ukraine

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

russian flagrussian flagrussian flagrussian flagrussian flagrussian flagrussian flag

Emir of Qatar arrives in Moscow to talk with Putin about Ukraine

  Photo: Emir of Qatar Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani and Russian President Vladimir Putin (Getty Images)

Photo: Emir of Qatar Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani and Russian President Vladimir Putin (Getty Images)© RBC-Ukraine (UK)

The Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, arrived in Moscow today, April 17, for a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The leaders of the countries will discuss the war in Ukraine and the Middle East, Reuters reports.

The Kremlin has called Al Thani’s visit “very important.”

 

Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov stated that the leaders will have a “serious conversation” covering a wide range of issues and will sign a number of agreements.

"It is difficult to overestimate the role of Qatar as a whole now in many regional and even world affairs," Peskov noted.

He also added that Russian-Qatari relations are developing dynamically and that contacts between the heads of state are fairly frequent.

Qatar’s Minister of State for Foreign Affairs, Mohammed Al-Khulaifi, told Russian media that the emir’s talks with Putin will address Ukraine, Syria, the Gaza Strip, and energy, particularly liquefied natural gas (LNG).

Qatar’s mediation

Qatar has repeatedly attempted to act as a mediator between Russia and Ukraine and has also assisted in the return of children from both countries who were separated from their parents during the war.

This week, Russia and Qatar confirmed that their leaders will discuss efforts to reach a peace agreement to end the war in Ukraine.

US mediation

The US is also seeking to play a leading role as a mediator between Ukraine and Russia in efforts to end the war. US President Donald Trump has repeatedly stated his desire to “put an end to the bloodshed,” though no breakthrough has been achieved so far.

Last week, Trump’s special envoy, Steve Witkoff, traveled to Moscow and met with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The talks reportedly lasted nearly five hours.

Witkoff described the negotiations with the Kremlin leader as “compelling” and stated that they discussed “steps that could bring an end to the war in Ukraine.”

Later, The Wall Street Journal reported that several advisors to President Trump urged him to be more cautious about Moscow’s statements regarding a ceasefire.

Nevertheless, Trump “continues to side with envoy Steve Witkoff, who believes that Putin wants peace after having met with him twice in Moscow.” 

Story by Kateryna Shkarlat: RBC Ukraine

Is there a £22 billion ‘black hole’ in the public finances?

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

uk flaguk flaguk flaguk flaguk flaguk flaguk flag

Is there a £22 billion ‘black hole’ in the public finances?  

In a speech in the Downing Street garden today, the Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said there’s a “£22 billion black hole in the public finances”. 

We’d already heard Labour party chair Ellie Reeves mention the same figure during interviews this morning.

Mr Starmer and Ms Reeves are referring to an announcement made by the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, last month. At the time, she said an audit by the Treasury had discovered a £22 billion forecast overspend this year. 

We looked into this last month. 

Ahead of the election, the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) had said that a new government would likely see a shortfall of £10-£20 billion by 2028/29. After the chancellor’s statement, IFS Director Paul Johnson said many of the challenges Labour outlined in July were “entirely predictable”, but that the in-year financial pressures did “genuinely appear to be greater than could be discerned from the outside”. 

Following the chancellor’s statement, the Office for Budget Responsibility said it had launched a review into the preparation of the Departmental Expenditure Limits forecast for the March 2024 Economic and Fiscal Outlook, the report they produced for the then Conservative government’s Spring Budget. The review would look at the “adequacy of the information” provided by the Treasury at the time.  

Honesty in public debate matters

 

27 August 2024, 1.21pm

The junior doctors strikes aren’t quite ‘fixed’ yet

The Labour party chair and minister without portfolio, Ellie Reeves, said on Sky News this morning: “We’ve come into government. We’ve fixed the disputes with the junior doctors, so that people can get the appointments that they need.”

It’s true that the government has made an offer considered acceptable by the BMA, the union that represents the doctors. 

However, it’s probably going a bit far to say this means they’ve “fixed” the dispute, since the doctors themselves are still voting on whether to accept the offer. The referendum to decide this doesn’t close until 15 September.

We’ve asked Ms Reeves for comment and will update this blog with any response.

In January, we fact checked former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak when he made a similar claim, saying the previous government had “reached resolution” with other doctors, when at the time both consultants and specialty/specialist doctors had not yet confirmed that their strikes were over.

NHS satisfaction and waits can’t be compared throughout history

The Secretary of State for Wales, Jo Stevens, claimed earlier today that the last Labour government saw the highest patient satisfaction and the shortest waiting lists in the NHS’s history. In fact we don’t have comparable data going back long enough, so we can’t be sure that either of these claims is true.

Speaking on Times Radio on 20 August, Ms Stevens said: “The last time that we had two Labour governments in the United Kingdom, one in Wales and one in Westminster, we had the highest patient satisfaction in NHS history and the shortest waiting list times as well.”

We’ve fact checked these claims a number of times before, such as when Keir Starmer said it last year, and then again during his election campaign.

}

As we said then, we’ve not been able to find a consistent measure of patient satisfaction over the history of the NHS. The Picker Institute, who conduct research on people’s experience of care, confirmed that they are also not aware of comparable data covering both the last Labour government and the Conservative-led government that followed.

Public satisfaction with the NHS began to be measured consistently in 1983, and reached its highest point in 2010, just after the end of the last Labour government. (Although it’s unlikely the Conservative-led coalition that followed had significantly influenced the NHS by then.)

Likewise, we can’t say whether Labour delivered the shortest NHS waiting lists because waiting lists have been measured in several different ways since the NHS was founded.

Experts at the Nuffield Trust told us that they were not aware of any data that would allow a direct comparison of waiting lists throughout the history of the NHS.

We’ve contacted Ms Stevens and will update this blog with any response.

A-level results week sees repeat claims from both main parties

This week saw A-level results released across England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and politicians from both sides of the House have repeated claims that we’ve looked at before. 

Speaking on BBC Breakfast, Labour’s education secretary Bridget Phillipson stated: “We’ve seen big rises under the last government where it comes to child poverty.”

As we’ve explained in previous fact checks, there are different ways of measuring child poverty. While some measures show an increase since 2010, at least one measure—the number of children in absolute low income after housing costs—fell during the period of Conservative-led or Conservative government, from 3.7 million in 2009/10 to 3.6 million in 2022/23. 

Meanwhile, Full Fact’s AI tools alerted us to another claim we’d looked into previously. Conservative shadow minister Greg Smith wrote in the Daily Express: “Since 2010, the percentage of state-funded schools in England rated as ‘Good’ or ‘Outstanding’ by Ofsted has surged from 68% to 90%.”

This is similar to a claim made earlier this year by then schools minister Damian Hinds. When we looked at that we found that, although it is accurate for England, the way schools are inspected has changed, making direct comparisons between these time periods difficult.

 

How does the UK’s trade with China and Taiwan compare?

We’ve been asked to have a look at comments made by the Conservative MP and former minister David Davis MP on a recent episode of //www.youtube.com/@LeadingTRIP" style="box-sizing: border-box; color: rgb(30, 30, 30); text-decoration: none; background: linear-gradient(rgb(0, 252, 232) 0px, rgb(0, 252, 232) 100%) 0px 0px / 0px 0px repeat-y scroll padding-box border-box rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); --box-shadow-color: #00FCE8; box-shadow: rgb(0, 252, 232) 0px -2px 0px 0px inset; --animated-link-color: #00FCE8; transition: background-size 0.2s;">Leading, an interview strand of The Rest is Politics podcast, hosted by Rory Stewart and Alastair Campbell. 

In the podcast, Mr Davis and Mr Stewart discussed trade barriers with China. Mr Davis said graphics chips in computers come from Taiwan, which was then followed by this exchange: 

RS: “Nobody’s putting tariff barriers against Taiwan, they’re putting tariff barriers against China”.

DD: “But that’s where it comes from… Most of our trade is with Taiwan, that’s the first thing to know about this”. 

It’s not entirely clear what comparison Mr Davis was making. We’ve contacted him and will update this blog if we receive a reply. 

But official statistics show that the total value of the UK’s trade with China is greater than its trade with Taiwan. 

In the four quarters to the end of Quarter 1 2024, the value of total trade between the UK and Taiwan was £7.2 billion. In the same period, the UK’s trade with China was worth £86.5 billion. Taiwan was the UK’s 35th largest trading partner, and China the 6th largest.

While the UK doesn’t recognise Taiwan as a state, since 1991 the UK and Taiwan have held annual ministerial trade talks. 

Update: We are grateful to Mr Davis for clarifying that he intended to refer solely to supply of very advanced technology, specifically logic chips (<10 nanometres), the majority of which are made in Taiwan, rather than to the UK’s overall trade, or its trade in tech products generally, with Taiwan and China. 

How old is former President Donald Trump?

Following the news that Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris has chosen her running mate (Minnesota governor Tim Walz), we’ve seen coverage of the US election in some UK newspapers this morning. 

However, two of the papers covering the story have incorrectly stated the age of the Republican candidate and former President, Donald Trump, on their front pages. 

The Times said Mr Trump is 74, while the Telegraph said he’s 77. Mr Trump was born on 14 June 1946—meaning he’s now 78 years old. 

Parliament may be in recess, but there are still facts to check

You may have noticed it’s been slightly quiet over here on our politics blog. 

Parliament rose for its summer recess on 30 July, just a few weeks after the general election. 

Before then, we covered Sir Keir Starmer’s first PMQs as Prime Minister, and looked at public spending in Scotland, as well as claims about the two-child benefit cap. 

However, we’re still busy checking facts. 

The big political story in the last week or so has been the disorder and rioting following the stabbings in Southport. We’ve written about the role misinformation has played in these events, as well as an explainer on the riots, and the response by government and the police. We will continue to monitor developments and fact check related claims as long as necessary. 

In the last couple of weeks, we’ve also covered online claims about the pensions former prime ministers receive, the Paris Olympics, as well as claims about the US—where the presidential race is heating up. 

Worry not—assuming it’s not recalled sooner, Parliament’s back on 2 September, though it’ll rise again 10 days later, on 12 September, for the party conferences. We’ll keep checking the facts in the meantime.

26 July 2024, 12.17pm

What was the basis for Labour’s claim about £300 energy bill savings?

The Conservatives have claimed Labour “lied” about how much its energy plans would save people on their energy bills.

Labour said during the election that its plan to achieve ‘clean energy’ (meaning power generated through fossil-free energy sources) would save families “up to £300” on their bills per year by 2030.

But it was reported by the Daily Mail yesterday that Number 10 would no longer commit to this figure.

We looked at this figure before the election and found that at that point it was already out of date.

It’s based on a report by the energy think tank Ember, which estimated that under a scenario in which the UK met its renewable energy commitments, the average household electricity bill would be around £300 lower in 2030 than in 2023.

However, the £300 figure is based on the level of the energy price cap in July-September 2023. The price cap has since decreased (though is forecast to increase again later this year).

The £300 figure is also not a direct assessment of the impact of Labour’s plans, but an estimate of the impact of a different, less ambitious scenario than Labour is proposing.

Was there a nine-year ‘ban’ on onshore wind farms?

Energy security and Net Zero minister Ed Miliband said the government had lifted a nine-year “ban” on onshore wind in England, during interviews on BBC Breakfast, BBC Radio 4’s Today programme [1:55:59] and Sky News this morning. This was similarly reported by the Times. 

As we’ve explained before, while policies introduced in 2015 were often described as a “de-facto ban”, due to a substantial decrease in applications for onshore wind sites, there was no formal ban on onshore wind farms as such. 

We’ve contacted Mr Miliband for comment and will update this blog if we receive a response.

 

Minister continues to confuse NHS waiting lists

Labour MP and Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden seems to have confused the number of people on NHS waiting lists with the number of cases.

Giving a statement in the House of Commons on the Covid-19 Inquiry, Mr McFadden said: “As I stand here today with 8 million people on NHS waiting lists.”

This is a mistake we’ve seen a lot of and involves mixing up the number of cases on the main waiting list in England (7.6 million according to the latest data) with the number of individual people (around 6.4 million).

The number of cases will always be greater than the number of individual people because some people will be waiting for treatment for more than one thing.

We’ve fact checked similar claims a number of times over the last year—including when Mr McFadden used the 8 million figure in May.

In April 2024, the Office for National Statistics published waiting list survey data giving a greater insight into how many people are waiting across other types of waiting lists not covered by the main waiting list.

This indicated that in January and February 2024, around 21% of adults in England—or 9.7 million adults—were “currently waiting for a hospital appointment, test, or to start receiving medical treatment through the NHS”.

Reference: Fukk Facting: Politics Live: 

The Empire of Mali (1230-1600)

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

maliflagmaliflagmaliflagmaliflagmaliflagmaliflagmaliflagmaliflagmaliflag

The Empire of Mali (1230-1600

The Empire of Mali was one of the largest empires in West African History, and at its height, it spanned from the Atlantic Coast to central parts of the Sahara desert [i]. The Empire was founded in 1235 CE by the legendary King Sundiata [ii] and lasted until the early 1600s CE [iii]. The Empire’s most famous ruler was named Mansa Musa, and chroniclers of the times wrote that when he travelled to Mecca on a pilgrimage he distributed so much gold that he caused great inflation lasting a decade [iv].

History

The Mali Empire arose with the consolidation of several small Malinké Kingdoms in Ghana around the areas of the upper Niger River [v]. Most of what is known about the Empire of Mali’s early history was collected by Arabic scholars in the 1300s and 1400s [vi]. A King named Sumanguru Kanté ruled the Susu Kingdom, which had conquered the Malinké people in the early 13th century [vii]. The King known as Sundiata (also spelt Sunjata) organised the Malinké resistance against the Susu Kingdom [viii], and Sundiata is believed by many historians, such as Conrad David and Innes Gordon, to have founded Mali when he defeated Sumanguru Kanté in 1235 [ix] [x].

The development of the empire began in its capital city of Niani, which was also coincidentally the birthplace of the empire’s founder and King Sundiata [xi]. Sundiata built a vast empire that stretched from the Atlantic Coast south of the Senegal River to Goa on the east of the Middle Niger bend.

Economy and Society in the Empire of Mali

The Mali Empire consisted of outlying areas and small kingdoms. All these Kingdoms pledged allegiance to Mali by offering annual tributes in the form of rice, millet, lances and arrows [xii]. Mali prospered from taxes collected from its citizens, and all goods brought in and out of the Empire were heavily taxed while all gold nuggets belonged to the King. However, gold dust could be traded and at certain times gold dust was used as currency together with salt and cotton cloth [xiii]. Cowrie shells from the Indian Ocean were later used as currency in the internal trade of Western Sahara [xiv].

Mali, and especially the city of Timbuktu, was famous a centre of learning and spectacular architecture [xv] such as the Sankara Madrassa - a great centre of learning - and the University of Sankore which continued to produce a great many astronomers, scholars and engineers long after the end of the Empire of Mali. French colonial occupation is considered to have contributed to the University’s decline in its quality of education [xvi].

While Mali was a monarchy ruled by the Mansa or Master, much of the state power was in the hands of court officials [xvii]. This meant that the Empire could survive several periods of instability and a series of bad rulers. The Empire of Mali was also a multi-ethnic and multi-linguistic empire, and Islam was the dominant religion [xviii].

Leadership

Mali’s rulers adopted the title of ‘Mansa’ [xix].  Mali’s founder, Sundiata, firmly established himself as a strong leader in both the religious and secular sense [xx], claiming that he had a direct link to spirits of the land, thus making him the guardian of the ancestors. His empire extended from the fringes of the forest in the southwest through the grassland country of the Malinké to the Sahel and Southern Sahara ports of the Walatta and Tandmekka [xxi], and Arabic scholars estimate that Sundiata ruled for about 25 years and died in 1255 [xxii].

Despite the great extent of the Empire of Mali it was often plagued by insufficient leadership [xxiii]. Yet Sundiata’s son Mansa Wali [xxiv], who became the next King, is considered to have been one of the most powerful rulers of Mali [xxv].  Mansa Wali would, in turn, be succeeded by his brother Wati, who was succeeded by his brother called Kahlifa [xxvi]. Kahlifa was seen as a particularly bad ruler, and some chroniclers describe how he would use bows and arrows to kill people for entertainment [xxvii]. Because of his misrule, Kahlifa was deposed and replaced by a grandchild of Sundiata named Abu Bakr [xxviii]. Abu Bakr had been adopted by Sundiata as a son, although he was a grandchild and the son of Sundiata's daughter, which would have greatly strengthened his claim to the throne [xxix].

 

The leadership trouble in the Malian Empire would continue after the ascension of Abu Bakr. Abu Bakr was deposed in a coup by a man named Sakura, who was either a slave [xxx] or a military commander [xxxi]. The low stature of Sakura perhaps implies that the royal family had lost much of its popularity amongst the common people [xxxii]. Sakura’s reign, however, would also be a troubled one; after he had converted to Islam, Sakura undertook a pilgrimage to Mecca but was killed by the Danakil people [xxxiii]  during his return journey while in the city of Tadjoura [xxxiv]. It is disputed why Sakura was in Tadjoura, as it was not a natural route to take when returning from Mecca to Mali, and also for what reasons he was killed [xxxv]. Some suggest that he was killed because the Danakil wanted to steal his gold [xxxvi].

Sakura’s rise to power also shows us that the ruling family, and the Mansa, had limited power in the Empire of Mali and that the officers of the court wielded significant power [xxxvii] in comparison. The Empire of Mali was organised into provinces with a strict hierarchical structure [xxxviii] in which each province had a Governor, and each town had a mayor or mochrif [xxxix]. Large armies were deployed to stop any rebellions in the smaller kingdoms and to safeguard the many trade routes [xl]. The decentralisation of power to lower levels of government bureaucracy through court officers, together with a strict hierarchical structure, was part of why the Malian Empire was so stable despite a series of bad rulers [xli]. Despite squabbles within the ruling family, the devolution of state administrative power through lower structures meant that the Empire could function quite well. In times of good rulers, the Empire would expand its territory, rendering it one of the largest Empires in West African history [xlii].

 

The famous Mansa Musa

It was in this context that the Empire of Mali’s most famous ruler, Mansa Musa, ascended to the throne. It is debated by historians whether Mansa Musa was the grandson of one of Sundiata’s brothers, thus making him Sundiata’s grand-nephew, or if he was the grandson of Abu Bakr [xliii].  What is known is that Mansa Musa converted to Islam and underwent a pilgrimage to Mecca in 1324, accompanied by 60 000 individuals and large quantities of gold [xliv]. His generosity was supposedly so great that by the time he left Mecca he had used every piece of gold he had taken with him, and had to borrow money for the return trip [xlv].

Mansa Musa was known to be a wise and efficient ruler, and one of his greatest accomplishments was his commission of some of the greatest buildings of Timbuktu. In 1327 the Great Mosque in Timbuktu was constructed [xlvi] and Timbuktu would later become a centre of learning [xlvii]. At the end of Mansa Musa’s reign, he had built and funded the Sankara Madrassa, which subsequently becomes one of the greatest centres of learning in the Islamic world, and the greatest library in Africa at the time [xlviii]. The Sankara Madrassa is estimated to have housed between 250 000 and 700 000 manuscripts, making it the largest library in Africa since the Great Library of Alexandria [xlix].  Some sources claim that during his reign Mansa Musa conquered 24 cities with its surrounding land, thus expanding the empire greatly [l]. Mansa Musa is estimated to have died in 1337, and would pass the title of Mansa to his son, Mansa Maghan [li]. 

The Great Mosque of Timbuktu

The decline of the Mali Empire

The period of 1360 – 1390 was a time of troubles for the Empire of Mali [lii]. The Empire suffered under several bad rulers with short reigns [liii]. The throne changed hands between several members of the ruling family and was at one point seized by a man named Mahmud, who was not from Mali nor part of the ruling family [liv]. Eventually, Mansa Mari Djata II managed to regain the throne for the ruling dynasty, but his despotic rule ruined the state [lv]. As in previous years, it was a court official who brought the Empire back on track after a series of bad rulers. Mari Djarta, a ‘wazir’ (minister), took power and ruled, essentially acting as regent, through King Mansa Musa II [lvi].  During the reign of Mari Djarta (also known as Mari Djarta III) the Empire of Mali would restore some of the power that it had lost during the preceding 30 years of misrule and civil war [lvii].

Mansa Musa II died in 1387 and was succeeded by his brother Mansa Magha II, who would also be the puppet of powerful court officials [lviii]. After a year Mansa Musa II was killed, thus ending the line of kings which descended from Mansa Musa I [lix]. This triggered the decline of the Empire of Mali and in 1433 the city was conquered by Tuareg nomads [lx]. For the next 100 years the Empire would slowly give way to the Songhay conquerors from the east, and by the 1500s it had been reduced to only its Malinké core lands [lxi]. During the 17th century Mali had broken into a number of minor independent chiefdoms and thus the Mali Empire was no longer the superpower it had been in its prime [lxii].

Referen ce: Soth Africn History Line:

Namibia Set To Deport 500 US Nationals Without Visas

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

namiobia flagnamiobia flagnamiobia flagnamiobia flagnamiobia flagnamiobia flagnamiobia flagnamiobia flagnamiobia flag

Namibia Set To Deport 500 US Nationals Without Visas

“The Namibian Government’s decision to impose visa requirements is not one of aggression, but fairness.”
 

Namibia has officially implemented new visa requirements for nationals from the United States, the United Kingdom, and 31 other countries, ending its long-standing policy of visa-free entry for citizens of these nations.

The move represents a significant shift in the country’s immigration policy and has drawn international attention for its symbolism.

The new visa rules came into effect on 1 April 2025, less than a week after Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah was sworn in as Namibia’s first female president on 25 March.

South Africa, Namibia’s southern neighbour and key economic partner, will remain unaffected by the new policy.

The Namibian Ministry of International Relations and Cooperation addressed the diplomatic community ahead of the rollout, clarifying the intent behind the changes.

“The Namibian Government’s decision to impose visa requirements is not one of aggression, but fairness,” the Ministry stated, suggesting that the policy aims to mirror the entry requirements Namibian citizens face when travelling to many of the targeted countries.

“Countries that do not grant reciprocal visa exemptions to Namibian passport holders are now required to obtain visas on arrival when visiting Namibia.”

According to MSN, the change follows the UK’s 2023 decision to revoke visa-free access for Namibian citizens and mirrors broader global trends in reassessing bilateral visa arrangements.

In conjunction with the policy change, President Nandi-Ndaitwah has announced the deportation of over 500 US nationals currently residing in Namibia without valid visas.

“These individuals are currently being served with deportation notices,” a senior government source confirmed.

“The new administration remains committed to upholding immigration laws and ensuring all residents and visitors remain compliant.”

The 33 countries that will now require visas are:

Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Moldova, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, United Kingdom, and United States.

[Source: MSN] 

Reference: www.2oceansvibe.com/2025/04/17/

Edward I (Longshanks) Expells the Jews from England - 1290

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

uk flaguk flaguk flaguk flaguk flaguk flaguk flaguk flag

Edward I (Longshanks) Expells the Jews from England - 1290

A painting at Westminster Abbey thought to be a portrait of Edward I.

A painting at Westminster Abbey thought to be a portrait of Edward I. "Half figure of Edward facing left with short, curly hair and a hint of beard. He wears a coronet and holds a sceptre in his right hand. He has a blue robe over a red tunic, and his hands are covered by white, embroidered gloves. His left hand seems to be pointing left, to something outside the picture."

In 1290 King Edward I of England (Longshanks)Offsite Link issued an edict expelling all Jews from England.

"Lasting for the rest of the Middle Ages, it would be over 350 years until it was formally overturned in 1656. The edict was not an isolated incident but the culmination of over 200 years of conflict on the matters of usury. The first Jewish communities of significant size came to England with William the ConquerorOffsite Link in 1066. On the conquest of England, William instituted a feudal system in the country, whereby all estates formally belonged to the king, who appointed lords over vast estates, subject to duties and obligations (financial and knights) to the king. Under the lords were further subjects such as serfs, which were bound and obligated to their lords. Merchants had a special status in the system as did Jews. Jews were declared to be direct subjects of the King, unlike the rest of the population. This had advantages for Jews, in that they were not tied to any particular lord, but were subject to the whims of the king. Every successive King formally reviewed a royal charter granting Jews the right to remain in England. Jews did not enjoy any of the guarantees of Magna Carta of 1215.

"Economically, Jews played a key role in the country. The church at the time strictly forbade usury, or the lending of money for profit. This left a hole in the heart of the European economy that Jews quickly filled (canon law was not considered to apply to Jews, and Judaism permits loans with interest Offsite Linkbetween Jews and non-Jews).  As a consequence, some Jews made large amounts of money. However, taking advantage of their unique status as his direct subjects, the King could expropriate Jewish assets in the form of taxation. He levied heavy taxes on Jews at will without having to summon Parliament.  The Jewish community acted as a kind of giant monetary filter: Jews collected interest on money loaned to the people which the King could take at his pleasure.

"Jews acquired a reputation as extortionate money lenders which made them extremely unpopular with both the Church and the general public. While antisemitism was widespread in Europe, medieval England was particularly antisemitic. An image of the Jew as a diabolical figure who hated Christ started to become widespread, and antisemitic myths such as the Wandering Jew and ritual murders originated and spread throughout England; as well as Scotland and Wales.  Jews were said to hunt for children to murder before Passover so they could use their blood to make matzah. Antisemitism on a number of occasions sparked riots where many Jews were murdered, most famously in 1190 when over a hundred Jews were massacred in the city of York.

"The situation only got worse for Jews as the 13th century progressed. In 1218, England became the first European nation to require Jews to wear a marking badge. Taxation grew increasingly intense. Between 1219 and 1272, 49 levies were imposed on Jews for a total of 200,000 marks, a huge amount of money.  The first major step towards expulsion took place in 1275, with the Statute of Jewry. The statute outlawed all usury and gave Jews fifteen years to readjust. However, guilds as well as popular prejudice made Jewish movement into mercantile or agricultural pursuits almost impossible.

 

"While in GasconyOffsite Link in 1287, Edward ordered English Jews expelled. All their property was seized by the crown and all outstanding debts payable to Jews were transferred to the King’s name. It was a bleak sign of things to come. Edward’s personal views on Jews are something of a mystery. In the glimpses we have of his dealings with them, he seems interested but unsympathetic. His mother, however, does seem to have been anti-semitic.

Whatever his personal feelings, by the time he returned to England in 1289 Edward was deeply in debt. The next summer he summoned his knights to impose a steep tax. To make the tax more palatable, Edward in exchange essentially offered to expel all Jews. The heavy tax was passed, and three days later, on July 18, the Edict of Expulsion was issued. One official reason for the expulsion was that Jews had neglected to follow the Statute of Jewry. The edict of expulsion was widely popular and met with little resistance, and the expulsion was quickly carried out.

 

"The Jewish population in England at the time was relatively small. While population estimates vary, probably less than 1% of England was Jewish; perhaps 3,000 people.  The expulsion process went fairly smoothly, although there were a few horrific stories. One story told of a captain taking a ship full of Jews to the Thames while the tide was going out and convincing them to go out for a walk with him. He then lost them and made it back to his ship before the tide came back in, leaving them all to drown. Other stories exist of Jews being robbed or killed, but the majority of the Jews seem to have crossed the channel in safety" (Wikipedia article on Edict of Expulsion, accessed 02-15-2009).

Reference: History Informatiom,com 

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.

Ok
X

Right Click

No right click