MailChimp

Subscribe to Newsletter
Please wait

Cosmic Energy

Login Form

Ads Remote

Who's On Line

We have 61 guests and no members online

Ofcom launches investigation into David Lammy’s LBC radio show

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

uk flaguk flaguk flaguk flaguk flaguk flaguk flag

Ofcom launches investigation into David Lammy’s LBC radio show

Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg

Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg© PA Wire

A radio show hosted by shadow foreign secretary David Lammy on LBC is being investigated by Ofcom following complaints.

The media watchdog said it was looking into whether the programme on March 29 “broke our rules on politicians acting as news presenters”.

Mr Lammy announced Sir Jeffrey Donaldson’s resignation as DUP leader live on air.

Ofcom’s rules on due impartiality state: “No politician may be used as a newsreader, interviewer or reporter in any news programmes unless, exceptionally, it is editorially justified.

“In that case, the political allegiance of that person must be made clear to the audience.”

The episode of the show garnered 53 complaints, Ofcom said on Monday.

Mr Lammy has hosted a show on the radio station since 2022 following appearances standing in for other presenters.

Last month, episodes of GB News programmes presented by Tory MPs were found to have broken broadcasting rules by them acting as newsreaders.

Ofcom’s probe involved shows that were presented by former House of Commons leader Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, as well as Minister Without Portfolio Esther McVey and backbencher Philip Davies, and the channel was warned about potential sanctions if there are further breaches.

Married couple Ms McVey and Mr Davies are no longer part of the GB News line-up.

Also on Monday, Ofcom warned TalkTV following Julia Hartley-Brewer’s heated exchange about the Hamas-Israel war with Palestinian politician Dr Mustafa Barghouti on her show but declined to launch an investigation.

Ofcom said Ms Hartley-Brewer’s remarks “had the potential to be highly offensive to viewers” but due to their “brevity” and “audience expectations of this presenter and programme, which often features provocative viewpoints” did not reach the threshold for a probe.

“We are therefore issuing strong guidance to TalkTV on the need to take greater care to ensure that potentially highly offensive comments are justified by the context in order to comply with the Broadcasting Code. We expect the broadcaster to take this guidance into account in future programming.” 

The episode received more than 17,000 complaints. 

Story by Charlotte McLaughlin: The Independent: 

NATO needs to take punitive measures against Erdogan, here's why

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

us flagus flagus flagus flagus flagus flagus flagus flag

NATO needs to take punitive measures against Erdogan, here's why

 TURKISH PRESIDENT Recep Tayyip Erdogan leaves a news conference during a NATO leaders summit in Vilnius, last year.

TURKISH PRESIDENT Recep Tayyip Erdogan leaves a news conference during a NATO leaders summit in Vilnius, last year.© (photo credit: KACPER PEMPEL/REUTERS)

It’s hard to fathom why, since the failed military coup in 2016 in particular, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is still rampaging against his people and defying his Western allies with near impunity, especially as Turkey is a NATO member state, which requires all members to uphold democratic principles while fully adhering to its shared values and goals. 

Western officials often explain that Turkey occupies a critical geostrategic location between East and West and is the energy hub for Europe. In addition, Turkey hosts NATO’s long-range missile systems and US military forces at Incirlik Air Base. 

It’s hard to reconcile these explanations, however meritorious, with Erdogan’s egregious human rights violations and abrogation of Western values. To change his behavior, it’s essential to first assess the litany of his egregious domestic and foreign transgressions and take the necessary measures corresponding to the scope of his transgression. 

Erdogan’s human rights violations

Widespread human rights violations have continued since the failed 2016 coup, which includes arbitrary detentions, infringements of freedom of association and expression, violations of the right to work, and freedom of movement.

In addition, he fired 150,000 people, including public servants and teachers, falsely accusing them of affiliation with the Gülen movement, which Turkey alone considers a terrorist group. 

Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan meets with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in Ankara, Turkey August 23, 2022. (credit: MURAT CETINMUHURDAR/PRESIDENTIAL PRESS OFFICE/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS)

Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan meets with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in Ankara, Turkey August 23, 2022. (credit: MURAT CETINMUHURDAR/PRESIDENTIAL PRESS OFFICE/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS)© Provided by The Jerusalem Post

Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan meets with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in Ankara, Turkey August 23, 2022. (credit: MURAT CETINMUHURDAR/PRESIDENTIAL PRESS OFFICE/HANDOUT VIA REUTERS)

He also sought the extradition of Turkish citizens from other countries who are allegedly affiliated with the movement. Torture and ill-treatment became routine in police custody and prisons, which included severe beatings, sexual assault, and deprivation of sleep. To make matters worse, he detained human rights defenders and activists, intended to exert pressure on civil society groups and NGOs critical of him. 

Furthermore, he removed thousands of judges and prosecutors and replaced them with lackeys to do his bidding, and led a witch-hunt throughout the Turkish Air Force, accusing many officers of being Gülenists behind the coup.

He regularly bypasses legal procedures and engages in enforced disappearances and illegal transfers. 

Erdogan aggressively pursued critical journalists while blocking websites, media outlets, and general restrictions on the Internet, with over 100,000 websites blocked. Erdogan targeted the Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP), which predominantly represents the Kurdish community, by shutting down the party and attacking the rights of millions of Kurdish voters, deliberately subverting parliamentary democracy. He has also used excessive force, torture, and violence against Kurdish women while destroying their housing and cultural heritage, which has become standard under his reign of terror.

Erdogan’s defiance of his Western allies

Since 2016, many contentious issues have strained the relationship between Turkey, NATO, and the United States, and there seems to be no sign that any of these conflicting issues can be mitigated as long as Erdogan is allowed to leverage Turkey’s geostrategic importance to the West.  

Erdogan’s human rights abuses, democratic backsliding, and erosion of the rule of law in Turkey remain significant causes of friction. Erdogan has also initiated foreign policies contrary to NATO’s military and political interests – primarily Turkey’s purchase of the Russian S-400 missile defense system. This led to US sanctions as it was incompatible with Turkey’s commitments as a NATO ally.

In addition, Turkey’s military interventions in Syria have been at odds with US support for Kurdish forces in Syria, which is seen as vital in the fight against ISIS; Erdogan views the Kurdish YPG militia as a terrorist group linked to the PKK.

Turkey’s growing relationship with Russia and its cautious stance toward China, particularly regarding the Uighurs and cooperation in Syria, has been another source of constant friction. 

Furthermore, Erdogan’s threats to invade NATO member Greece and annex parts of EU member Cyprus over territorial disputes, particularly related to natural gas drilling rights, are seen as undermining the safety and security of the region. These issues are compounded by Turkey’s military exercises, which Greece and Cyprus view as violating their sovereignty. 

Erdogan’s objection to NATO membership of Sweden and Finland left the alliance troubled over how to deal with Erdogan’s voracious thirst to impose his will. Erdogan blackmailed Sweden to take a firmer stance against groups it considers terrorist organizations, such as the PKK. It wasn’t until Sweden addressed Turkey’s concerns that he finally conceded and allowed Sweden accession to NATO.  

There are other contentious issues, including Erdogan’s repeated demand that the US extradite Fethullah Gülen (which it refuses), whom he blames for the 2016 coup attempt, and the US and French recognition of the 1915 Armenian Genocide committed by the Ottoman Empire, which Erdogan fervently denies.

More recently, Erdogan has openly expressed support for Hamas, describing them not as terrorists but as “liberators” who are defending their land. Erdogan’s refusal to label it as a terrorist organization highlights his complicated relationship with regional powers and his efforts to position himself as a key player in Middle Eastern affairs. 

Erdogan refused to condemn Hamas’s savage attack that butchered 1,200 Israelis but accused Israel of behaving like a “war criminal” and committing “massacres” in Gaza and called for Israeli leaders to be tried for war crimes.  

NATO’s share of the blame

There is no doubt that Erdogan might have behaved differently had he been confronted by NATO and credibly been threatened with severe consequences if he had not changed course and complied with NATO’s core requirements. 

NATO’s failure to stand up to Erdogan and demand that all member states adhere to its values and its leniency in letting him violate its charter without penalties has only encouraged Erdogan to become ever more ruthless and defiant.

While it’s hard to take a stand against Turkey due to the above points, allowing it to continue uncritically is nothing but a slippery slope that will destroy the moral foundation and the military cohesiveness of NATO. 

Indeed, if NATO wants to maintain its cohesion and effectiveness, it cannot afford to allow any of its members to fan the flames. Thus, it’s time for NATO to take several punitive measures against Erdogan.  

Punitive measures

Although the NATO Charter doesn’t provide a mechanism to expel a member state, it’s time for NATO to stop relying solely on political and diplomatic channels to address disagreements with Erdogan, which have been elusive, and instead resort to broad and transparent punitive measures. 

These measures compounded by the massive losses of the AKP in municipal elections on March 31, especially in Istanbul, could potentially spell the beginning of the end of Erdogan’s political demise.

1. Imposing economic sanctions on Turkey, whether individual countries or groups of countries, such as the European Union. These could range from sanctions targeting specific individuals or sectors to more comprehensive economic measures. Turkey’s removal from the US F-35 program because of Erdogan’s military operation in Syria and his purchase of the S-400 system from Russia offers one good example.   

2. Limiting Turkey’s cooperation and participation in NATO activities by member states could exclude Turkey from certain joint activities. These include stopping sharing sensitive intelligence and excluding Turkey from NATO’s decision-making processes.  

3. Freezing or terminating bilateral or multilateral agreements between Turkey and other countries, or between Turkey and international organizations.  This includes not receiving Turkish attachés, finding an alternative to the Incirlik Air Base in Turkey once the turmoil in Europe and the Middle East subsides, which Erdogan has been using as leverage, and suspending collaboration on particular defense-related projects.  

4. Many countries and international organizations can exert diplomatic pressure on Turkey by publicly expressing disapproval of specific actions through formal condemnations, public statements, and high-level diplomatic talks. Finally, international legal mechanisms such as the International Criminal Court can address and investigate allegations of human rights abuses. 

Notwithstanding Turkey’s geostrategic importance, NATO should weigh Turkey’s contribution to the alliance against Erdogan’s defiance and make some concessions to accommodate him. Still, NATO cannot compromise its core values that sustain it as a viable and powerful military alliance.

The writer is a retired professor of international relations, most recently at the Center for Global Affairs at NYU. He teaches courses on international negotiation and Middle Eastern studies. 

Opinion by ALON BEN-MEIR : The Jerusalem Post. 

Brexit has made the UK a lower-status nation, says David Miliband

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

uk flaguk flaguk flaguk flaguk flaguk flaguk flag

Brexit has made the UK a lower-status nation, says David Miliband

David Miliband said the UK’s downward path would get worse if Donald Trump was re-elected.

David Miliband said the UK’s downward path would get worse if Donald Trump was re-elected.© Getty

The UK has lost influence since Brexit to become just one of many “middle powers” in the world, former foreign secretary David Miliband has said.

Writing for the Observer, Miliband, now president and chief executive of the International Rescue Committee, said that in order to reverse the decline, the UK needed to enter new “structures and commitments” with the EU on foreign policy.

“Our relations in Nato are strong, but with the EU they are almost nonexistent. And this is all the more glaring since the war in Ukraine has brought the EU and Nato closer together,” he said.

Miliband suggested that the UK’s downward trend could accelerate if Donald Trump was re-elected later this year. But he believes that, even if Joe Biden wins a second term, “the warning signs about American willingness, patience and ability to provide active and continuing strategic global leadership are still there”.

Related: In an increasingly unstable world, Britain can’t afford to isolate itself from its allies

He added: “In a world where the EU is shipping weapons to Ukraine, hosting 6 million Ukrainian refugees, is a major development actor, sits in the G20, and is a regulatory superpower in trade, climate and digital areas, we need our mindset to change.

“A UK policy on Russia separate from the EU will be weaker and less effective. The same is true in respect of China. So the decision of the UK in 2019 to refuse a political and foreign policy relationship with the EU needs to be reversed. Structures and commitments need to be put in place to drive cooperation and coordination in the many areas of shared foreign policy, defence, security and development policy interest.”

Miliband’s comments go far further than any policy outlined so far by Labour towards closer working with the EU, if the party wins power at the next general election.

Miliband, who was foreign secretary from 2007 to 2010 under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, says that “one of the delusions of Brexit” was that the UK’s destiny would depend only on its own decisions, rather than the ability to engage and bargain with other countries.

He said: “The danger for British policymakers was exemplified by the Johnson government: wishful thinking about our power and position in a world dominated by growing global risks and muscular, transactional, adroit – sometimes predatory – nations and non-state actors, all growing in influence by the weakening of the multilateral system.”

Britain, he said, still had global reach and power, and retained hard and soft power. It is also one of the world’s richer countries and is privileged to have a seat on the UN security council. “But we have an imperative to understand the realities of our power as it is today, and not as it used to be.

“We do not have the finance of Saudi Arabia, the EU anchor of France, the regional activism and risk appetite of Turkey or the demographic strength of India or Indonesia. We are one among a number of ‘middle powers’ in the global system. Our wealth, military assets and reputation have all declined relative to others in the last decade.

“Our position, on critical interests from the economy to the climate crisis, national security and international development, will get worse unless we get our act together. The reason is simple: the world is trending towards an unhealthy disequilibrium, and Britain is on the wrong side of some of the key trends.”

Story by Toby Helm Political editor 

Iran launches massive drone attack on Israel

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

 iran flagiran flagiran flagiran flagiran flagiran flagiran flag  

Iran launches massive drone attack on Israel

IDF spokesman Daniel Hagari said 'This is a severe and dangerous escalation'

IDF spokesman Daniel Hagari said 'This is a severe and dangerous escalation'© Provided by The Telegraph

Iran has launched a major drone attack on Israel as Benjamin Netanyahu said the country was prepared for a “direct attack” for the first time.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said Iran had launched dozens of drones from within its own territory, signalling that the long-awaited attack on Israel’s territory had begun.

Israeli forces said warships and fighter jets were on “high alert” and the US was working to help intercept the drones before they reached Israel’s airspace.

The drones launched from Iran were seen flying low as they passed over Iraq, in an apparent attempt to avoid radar detection. A loud buzzing noise could be heard on videos posted on social media as they passed overhead.

“We are closely monitoring Iranian killer drones that are en route to Israel sent by Iran,” Daniel Hagari, an IDF spokesman, said in a televised statement. 

“This is a severe and dangerous escalation. Our defensive and offensive capabilities are at the highest level of readiness ahead of this large-scale attack from Iran.” 

He added: “We are working in close cooperation with the United States and our partners in the region in order to act against the launches and intercept them.”

The Israeli military has already begun planning for a retaliatory strike on Iran or its proxy groups in the region.

Israeli civilians have been advised to monitor government alerts and follow advice from the Home Front command.

Schools across the country and beaches near Gaza have been closed “in light of the security situation,” Mr Hagari said.

He added that the IDF’s interception attempts would scramble GPS signals across the country.

The Israeli defences will involve fighter jets and navy ships, which are both equipped with anti-aircraft missiles, and Israel’s Iron Dome missile defence system.

The US has moved the USS Eisenhower aircraft carrier and three other warships closer to Israel in the northern Red Sea in recent days.

Jordan said its air defences were also ready to intercept and shoot down any Iranian drones or aircraft that violated its airspace, two regional security sources said. Mr Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, said: “Our defence systems are deployed, and we are prepared for any scenario, both in defence and offence.

“The State of Israel is strong, the IDF is strong, the public is strong. We appreciate the US for standing by Israel’s side as well as the support of the UK, France and many other countries.

“I established a clear principle – whoever hurts us, we will hurt them. We will defend ourselves from any threat and we will do so calmly and with determination.”

Benjamin Netanyahu convened a War Cabinet in Tel Aviv© Provided by The Telegraph

A statement from Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) reported on state television said: “In response to the recent crime of the Zionist regime against the Iranian consulate in Syria, the IRGC air forces have successfully fired tens of drones and missiles towards the occupied territories.”

However, by launching the drones from Iran, well over 1,000km away from Israel, the regime seems to have deliberately avoided the element of surprise.

Joe Biden, the US president, cut short a weekend trip to Delaware and returned to Washington to receive a briefing from his security team. Channel 12, an Israeli news network, reported that the US had been the first to warn Israel the attack was incoming.

A White House spokeswoman said the attack was “likely to unfold over a number of hours”, adding: “The United States will stand with the people of Israel and support their defence against these threats from Iran.”

Jake Sullivan, Mr Biden’s national security adviser, earlier on Saturday reiterated the US’s “ironclad” support for the defence of Israel, after the government said it had redirected some military assets there in response to Iran’s threats. 

The attack was first considered “imminent” by US intelligence on Wednesday, after Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader  said Israel “must be punished” for a strike on an Iranian embassy compound in Damascus on April 1.

The drone strike is thought to be directed at government and military buildings in Israel, not civilian targets. It is the first time that Iranian forces have directly attacked Israel, although Iran has backed the proxy groups Hamas and Hezbollah in Gaza and Lebanon.

Israel has indicated that it will strike Iran directly in response to any attack on its territory. Earlier on Saturday, Israel warned it would suffer the “consequences for choosing to escalate the situation any further”.

It was unclear whether the drone salvoes would be followed by further launches of cruise or ballistic missiles. It is thought Iran may have launched the drones well in advance of the missiles, in an attempt to ensure the weapons reach Israel at around the same time. 

Iran’s most notorious drone is the Shahed, which has been deployed by Russia against Ukraine and by Houthi rebels in Yemen.

Story by Tony Diver: The Telegraph:  

‘Hungarians rise’: Tens of thousands protest against Orban in Budapest

Star InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar InactiveStar Inactive

hungarianflaghungarianflaghungarianflaghungarianflaghungarianflaghungarianflaghungarianflaghungarianflag

‘Hungarians rise’: Tens of thousands protest against Orban in Budapest

‘Hungarians rise’: Tens of thousands protest against Orban in Budapest

‘Hungarians rise’: Tens of thousands protest against Orban in Budapest© Attila Kisbenedek, AFP

Tens of thousands of people staged a rally in Budapest on Saturday in support of a critic of Prime Minister Viktor Orban as he outlined plans to challenge the nationalist leader.

The protest against Orban’s government was called by lawyer and former insider Peter Magyar, who has shot to prominence in Hungarian politics over a child abuse scandal.

AFP journalists said about 100,000 protestors gathered in Kossuth Square in front of the parliament, with many carrying national flags and holding up signs that read “Hungarians rise!”

“We will take back our country step by step, and brick by brick we will build a sovereign, modern Hungary,” Magyar told a cheering crowd.

He said he would soon announce a new political party to run in European and local elections in June.

Magyar, 43, is the ex-husband of Orban’s former justice minister Judit Varga and was in the orbit of the ruling Fidesz party until he split, vowing to challenge Orban’s “power factory” by forming a new party.

Varga was forced to stand down from public life over her role in the pardoning of officials involved in a child abuse scandal and Magyar has since emerged as a fierce Orban critic.

Last month, Magyar released a recording allegedly implicating a top minister in a high-profile corruption case, and called for the chief prosecutor to resign. 

“Magyar’s initiative has to be supported because... with the current opposition, it is hopeless to fight Orban,” 49-year-old cook Leo Szabo told AFP, adding he would vote for Magyar’s party once it is operating.

Sports coach Tamara, 36, who declined to give her full name, said she was “sceptical”, but went to the protest since “something needed to be done because it’s insane how much this government has gotten away with”.

Twenty-year-old student Peter Nagy said he was willing to give Magyar a chance as Hungarians “had nothing to lose”.

According to a recent poll, Magyar’s party could get between 11 to 15 percent in the country of 9.7 million, where elections are due by 2026.

Orban is facing the biggest political crisis of his 14-year premiership since it emerged in February that a man convicted in a child sex abuse case had been granted a presidential pardon and was released from jail.

Since returning in 2010 to lead the EU member state, Orban has moved to curb press freedom and made other changes to tighten his grip on power, often clashing with Brussels over rule-of-law issues.

He has also clashed with other EU and NATO members over his ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin, maintained even after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

He held up an EU aid package for Ukraine for months, before finally lifting his veto in February.   

Story by NEWS WIRES

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.

Ok
X

Right Click

No right click